A curious Error
Ronald Hall
ron.hall at mcgill.ca
Fri Sep 3 01:28:28 UTC 2004
> You are/were running an old named with a new rndc.
>
>1480. [bug] Provide replay protection for rndc commands. Full
> replay protection requires both rndc and named to
> be updated. Partial replay protection (limited
> exposure after restart) is provided if just named
> is updated.
>
> If it continues ensure that you are starting the right instance
> of named.
>
>
Ok I'll buy that, but I only update via rpm from RedHat via
up2date - how does rndc and named
get out of date?
named -v yields BIND 9.2.4rc
rndc --version also yields BIND 9.2.4rc6 (after complaining
that --version is not a valid option :) )
Just curious
r
More information about the bind-users
mailing list