SOA and NS are canonical records?
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Wed May 5 06:02:28 UTC 2004
June <nfbz2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> thanks for the reply.
> Is there any reference says SOA and NS RRs both are canonical names? Or all
> RRs, except CNAME (alias), are canonical names, by definition?
Yes, rfc 1035
> "The issue is what the "key" of this line is, the leftmost part." What do
> mean by saying this? Do you mean "interior node" is the leftmost part?
Looking at the terminonlogy used in rfc1035 :
NAME an owner name, i.e., the name of the node to which this
resource record pertains.
--
Peter Håkanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list