Djbdns?
Kirk Strauser
kirk at strauser.com
Wed Jan 7 23:10:41 UTC 2004
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At 2004-01-07T21:48:14Z, /dev/rob0 <rob0 at gmx.co.uk> writes:
> Hmmm, I would have thought that the source being, uh, OPEN, to view and
> modify, would be "open source". I guess I need to brush up on my Newspeak,
> or something. :)
Yeah, the "Open Source" people picked a rather confusing name, although I
guess when you mean "sort of like Free Software but without the freedom",
you have to call it something. :)
>> Don't mistake "source is available" for "is open source". It's nowhere
>> close.
> You're making a very good point here, don't misunderstand me. But to
> argue terminology, I prefer "free software". No word games involved.
Likewise. And for a lot of stuff, I prefer "BSD". No games of any kind
involved. :)
> Still, ordinary users are not likely to suffer much under DJB's non-free
> licensing, or at least not perceptibly so. They do possibly suffer from
> the stagnation and the stifling effects on those who might improve the
> software, or perhaps even implement some unimplemented standards. We'll
> probably never see things like DHCP DDNS in djbdns.
From=20what I can tell, djbdns is no longer developed at all. The last
release is from 2001-02-11. I gather that you can download patches that
make djbdns do various modern tricks, but note that it's illegal for those
people to distribute a patched version; you have to do all the patching
yourself.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser
In Googlis non est, ergo non est.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA//JH05sRg+Y0CpvERAriMAJwM6mWtWpmA0gE4TvdoUZosH7aGKgCdGwIY
A9p33UIGCOGyW0qUbkVpUc0=
=pWTH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
More information about the bind-users
mailing list