Variations on lame delegations (terminology question)

[David Botham]

bind-users-bounce at isc.org wrote on 10/23/2003 04:58:22 PM:
> 
> My understanding of a "lame delegation" is that a listed nameserver for 
> a zone is not authoritative for that zone.
> 
> What terminology is/should be used if the listed nameserver isn't 
> a nameserver?  I.e. if it isn't and never does run a DNS nameserver?

Still lame.


> 
> And what if the NSDNAME of the NS record points to either a completely 
> non-existant node, or that node has no address records (A or AAAA)?

Mis-configured.  Also lame.

Dave...


> 
> 
> 
>