Bind 8 bug
Jack Tavares
j.tavares at F5.com
Wed Oct 29 23:29:40 UTC 2003
While the timer library may indeed have been=20
re-written, it was modeled after the bind8
version, I would imagine.=20
I have looked at the bind8 code and the=20
corresponding bind9 code and I am pretty sure
it is the same problem.
--
Jack
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Darcy [mailto:kcd at daimlerchrysler.com]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: Bind 8 bug
>=20
>=20
> Jack Tavares wrote:
>=20
> >We ran across a problem with timers due to heap management
> >in bind 8.
> >
> >It appears to have been fixed in bind 9 and above
> >
> > 199. [bug] isc_heap_delete() sometimes=20
> violated the heap
> > invariant, causing timer events not to be posted
> > when due.
> >
> >Are there plans to fix this in bind 8?
> >
> Since BIND 9 is a complete code rewrite versus BIND 8, what makes you=20
> think this is the same bug?
>=20
> - Kevin
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
More information about the bind-users
mailing list