stable named
Nilesh Naik
qmailindia at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 3 15:55:33 UTC 2003
Thanx
but i cant use openBSD or FreeBSD , i am good with
redhat and i cant take that descion too , i mean its
not in my hand , so kindly now let me know
which version should i install on redhat Linux
regards
Prashant
--- phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote:
>
> Nilesh Naik <qmailindia at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All=20
>
> > pls suggest me which version of bind is most
> stable
> > and reliable , i needs to install it on the redhat
> > linux system , right now i am running bind 9.1.0
> on
> > slave and bind 8.2.3-REL on master servers, and
> > facing hell lot of problems with it , so i need
> the
> > version of bindwhich is tested on redhat system
> and
> > know to be stable and reliable=20
>
> The most stable combination seems to be FreeBSD and
> bind 9.2.1=20=20
>
> OpenBSD is ok too. Redhat ? could be if you maek a
> careful
> installation and remove all "linuxconf" stuff.
>
>
> FreeBSD has a "pretested" "port" of bind-9.2.1,
> installed=20
> by simply :
> cd /usr/ports/net/bind9 ; make
>
> OpenBSD has simular features. Both are free as
> speech
>
> > regards
> > Prashant=20=20
>
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
>
> --=20
> Peter H=E5kanson=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
> IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg
> Riverside )
> Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm
> trying to keep spam out,
> remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me.
> Thanx.
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list