Large reverse in-addr.arpa delegation
David Botham
dns at botham.net
Wed Feb 12 19:37:43 UTC 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hulman, Patrick (CCI-Atlanta) [mailto:Patrick.Hulman at cox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: David Botham
> Cc: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: RE: Large reverse in-addr.arpa delegation
>
> um. I thought the rfc covered networks with fewer than 256 addresses
ie
> smaller than a /24.
Actually, it addresses delegation of in-addr.arpa zones that correlate
to IP networks that are subnetted on Non-Octet Boundaries. That is to
say anything other than:
/8, /16, /24 network prefixes...
If you have a copy of DNS & BIND 4th Edition, checkout page 236 for
narrative descriptions and case scenarios (also check the O'Reilly site
for errata, as there are a couple of minor typo's in a couple of the
$GENERATE examples...
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/dns4/errata/dns4.confirmed).
If you do not have a copy of DNS & BIND, hmmmmmmm....... :) ... No time
like the present...
(If I had a penny for every time I sold a copy of this book, hey
Cricket... :)
Thanks,
Dave...
>
> patrick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Botham [mailto:dns at botham.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:48 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: RE: Large reverse in-addr.arpa delegation
>
>
> Patrick,
>
> Check out RFC2317:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt?number=2317
>
> use $GENERATE or a script to make your db files...
>
>
> Dave...
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]
On
> > Behalf Of Hulman, Patrick (CCI-Atlanta)
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:35 AM
> > To: bind-users at isc.org
> > Subject: Large reverse in-addr.arpa delegation
> >
> > I'm trying to delegate large chunks of ip space. I'm using a 10
> network =
> > where I need to delegate three /16 and a /21 to different servers.
In
> =
> > this case i want to delegate 10.2.x.x/15 to ns1.foo.com and
> ns2.foo.com, =
> > 10.4.x.x to ns1.foo2.com ns2.foo2.com and 10.5.200.0/21 to
> ns1.foo3.com =
> > and ns2.foo3.com
> >
> > My question is how would the 10.in-addr.arpa look
> >
> [clip...]
> >
> >
> > patrick
> >
> >
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list