Different DNS resolutions from 2 servers
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Thu Oct 24 11:04:59 UTC 2002
Donald E. Foss <donald at coloexperts.com> wrote:
> The recursive servers in question are 12.41.62.103 for the one that
> doesn't work correctly. Pick any other server or a root server for one
> that does work correctly.
You will have to remove the zone from :
;; ANSWER SECTION:
stonewallkitchen.com. 1D IN NS dns1.registeredsite.com.
stonewallkitchen.com. 1D IN NS dns2.registeredsite.com.
stonewallkitchen.com. 1D IN NS dns3.registeredsite.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
dns1.registeredsite.com. 15M IN A 64.226.28.34
dns2.registeredsite.com. 15M IN A 66.111.73.174
dns3.registeredsite.com. 15M IN A 64.77.127.43
they seem to be your old nameservers, and they will continue to
emit faulty answers ( with the AA bit set) for as long as they
stay configured to.
> Donald E. Foss
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:12:33 +0000, Mark_Andrew wrote:
>>
>> Turn off the old nameservers or make them slaves and then
>> turn them off once all the TTL referencing them have expired.
>> At the moment the old nameservers are refreshing the NS
>> RRset everytime they are queried.
>>
>> Mark
>> --
>> Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
--
Peter Håkanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list