New version of Bind8 for W2k?
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Sun Nov 17 09:55:37 UTC 2002
Jeffery Jones <jefferjones at altavista.net> wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2002 18:13:17 -0000, phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote:
>>And what's your main objective with your nameservers: running
>>a ms OS or running a working nameserver ? The answer of that
>>question should steer your objectives.
> The answer steers toward converting from Bind to MS DNS on Win 2000. The last 2 major Bind exploits have not affected MS DNS. If DNS is the only service exposed to the internet, the question of OS reliability is removed.
There is more exploits/weaknesses that ms dns has but bind dont. So it's
not as simple as that.
> Conclusion: For the most reliable and secure nameserver, switch to MS DNS on Win 2000.
At least will it achieve the most expensive dns.
--
Peter Håkanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list