Suggestion for FAQ improvement
Nate Campi
nate at campin.net
Sun Mar 24 06:26:43 UTC 2002
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 07:45:33PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Michael Kjorling wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > In the FAQ answer for the "CNAME and other data" problem
> > (http://dougbarton.net/bind-users/FAQ.html#CNAME-other), I believe
> > that it would not be inappropriate to mention that the DNSSEC record
> > types KEY, NXT and SIG are excluded from the "CNAME and other data"
> > rule.
>
> I considered that, but IMO DNSSEC is a more advanced topic, and
> unecessarily confusing for new users.
Compromise suggestion:
For exceptions to this rule which only apply if using the DNSSEC
extensions, see http://blah/dnssec.html
This way they get the fact that there is an exception, but don't get
slammed with the details.
--
Nate
Sysadmins don't go to hell; we're already doing our time in purgatory.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list