Suggestion for FAQ improvement
Michael Kjorling
michael at kjorling.com
Sat Mar 23 11:52:54 UTC 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In the FAQ answer for the "CNAME and other data" problem
(http://dougbarton.net/bind-users/FAQ.html#CNAME-other), I believe
that it would not be inappropriate to mention that the DNSSEC record
types KEY, NXT and SIG are excluded from the "CNAME and other data"
rule.
Michael Kjörling
- --
Michael Kjörling -- Programmer/Network administrator ^..^
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4 \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e
``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html
iD8DBQE8nGydKqN7/Ypw4z4RAj59AKDrrI2pSHAAohKT70Mhhc+q4flO/gCdEOM+
WD7yN1YwBK3+b86sdTeFB1w=
=hilp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bind-users
mailing list