MX question
Brian Dickson
bcdickson at kcc.usda.gov
Tue Apr 16 12:58:59 UTC 2002
Kevin Darcy wrote:
> William Stacey wrote:
>
>
>>> Of course, I'm not so naive to think all implementations follow standards.
>>
>> But
>>
>>> it's hard to know what form of standards non-compliance Microsoft was
>>
>> trying to
>>
>>> accommodate with this multiple-A scheme.
>>
>> I fail to see how bashing MS has any relavance to this question. aol and
>> yahoo do the same thing.
>
>
> Um, the domain in question was microsoft.com, not aol.com or yahoo.com. Look at
> the message which started the thread.
>
>
> - Kevin
Yeah, but he is saying that they do it also. It's for load balancing
with cluster volumes. Basically, both machines point to a harddrive
farm and if one loosing it's connection the other still has the connect
and you use that one instead.
Brian
More information about the bind-users
mailing list