Allow Multiple-Cnames in BIND 9
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Nov 30 00:42:51 UTC 2001
>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Manning <bmanning at ISI.EDU> writes:
Bill> bind 9 encourages consistant practice, sometimes w/o
Bill> anything other than "it ought to work this way". The core
Bill> specs are often vauge, which leads to commentary &
Bill> clarifications.
That's as may be. But RFC1034 could hardly be any clearer about
multiple CNAMEs:
If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other data should be present
As far as I know this has only been relaxed by RFC2535 so that a CNAME
can have a SIG and NXT record.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list