CNAMES and OTHER data

Marc Storck marc at storck.org
Tue May 15 22:08:36 UTC 2001


Hmmm..... sometime in the past I used granitecanyon.com as DNS provider and
I used wonders.net as host...

while wonders.net was experimental and had a dynamic IP, we added the
following to the Zone we had at GraniteCanyon:

$ORIGIN sample.domain

@    IN    A    wonders.dyn.ml.org
(I forgot to mention Wonders.net used Monolith for Static Host to Dynamic
IP)
I didn't have any real experience with DNS so I wasn't aware it was
"illegal/incorrect", but I worked during our 2-3 months of experimental
service...

Now I'm stuck at the same point, I have/want to point a zone-apex to another
hostname.....

any Ideas?

I thought of using nsupdate but I don't see a way how I can restrict access
to one zone only.... or how I can give different clients access to only
their zone.....

Best Regards,

Marc


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Kevin Darcy <kcd at daimlerchrysler.com>
À : bind-users at isc.org <bind-users at isc.org>
Date : Dienstag, 15. Mai 2001 23:47
Objet : Re: CNAMES and OTHER data


>
>You took me too literally. You can't point an A record at a name. But you
can
>change the record type to "A" *and* change the name on the right-hand side
to
>whatever address the name resolves to.
>
>
>- Kevin
>
>Marc Storck wrote:
>
>> Hello Kevin,
>>
>> my BIND 8.2.3T9B does not accept an IN A record which is pointing to FQDN
>> instead of an IP, does yours work???
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> >No, there is no workaround; only a fix. Replace that CNAME with an A
record
>> >and/or whatever other records you want to be owned by "foo.com".
>> >
>> >Why do you find it "strange" for a zone-apex name to own an A record?
>> >Zone-apex names own MX records all of the time. How is owning an A
record
>> >fundamentally different from that?
>> >
>> >
>> >- Kevin
>> >
>> >Marc Storck wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks Charles,
>> >>
>> >> I just put them there to make it evident that the 3 records are for
the
>> >> ORIGIN.
>> >> The main question is: Is there a work-around the CNAME and OTHER data
>> >> error???
>> >>
>> >> And I would like to apologize to the list that my first message came
in 3
>> >> times, but I got some problems with my mailer, which are now resolved.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Marc
>> >>
>> >> -----Message d'origine-----
>> >> De : Charles Bodley <Bodley at tflogic.com>
>> >> À : 'Marc Storck' <mstorck at ibone.org>
>> >> Date : Dienstag, 15. Mai 2001 21:05
>> >> Objet : RE: CNAMES and OTHER data
>> >>
>> >> >I'm not positive but I don't think the second and third @'s are
>> necessary.
>> >> >
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On
>> >> >Behalf Of Marc Storck
>> >> >Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:12 PM
>> >> >To: bind-users at isc.org
>> >> >Subject: CNAMES and OTHER data
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> >I would like to know if there is a workaround for this illegal case:
>> >> >
>> >> >$ORIGIN foo.com
>> >> >
>> >> >@    IN    SOA ........
>> >> >@    IN    NS    ns1.foo.com.
>> >> >@    IN    CNAME    foo.net.
>> >> >
>> >> >This gives a "CNAMES and OTHER data" error but is there a workaround.
>> >> >
>> >> >Some BIND versions did allow:
>> >> >
>> >> >$ORIGIN foo.com
>> >> >
>> >> >@    IN    SOA ........
>> >> >@    IN    NS    ns1.foo.com.
>> >> >@    IN    A    foo.net. ;very strange but it worked!!!!
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> >Marc
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list