cname quick question
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu Mar 8 22:13:10 UTC 2001
At 7:58 PM +0000 3/8/01, peter at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu.invalid wrote:
> I would rather say that dig 8.3 cannot handle DNAMES. Trying with
> the dig that build with bind 9 shows :
Of course, you're using a BINDv9 dig against a BINDv9 server, and
getting back an answer that is not understood by earlier versions of
BIND.
However, it would be very interesting to see what happens when a
BINDv9 dig queries a domain (such as rfc1035.org) through a BIND 8
server -- does BIND 8 freak out when it sees the DNAME records? What
gets passed through to the BINDv9 client?
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# 531-byte qrpff-fast, Keith Winstein and Marc Horowitz <sipb-iap-dvd at mit.edu>
# MPEG 2 PS VOB file on stdin -> descrambled output on stdout
# arguments: title key bytes in least to most-significant order
# Usage:
# qrpff 153 2 8 105 225 /mnt/dvd/VOB_FILE_NAME | extract_mpeg2 | mpeg2_dec -
$_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=(
$m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])&110;$t^=(72, at z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%16
-2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0, at z)[$_%8]}(16..271);if((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$h
=5;$_=unxb24,join"", at b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$
d=unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])<<9|ord$b[3];$d=$d>>8^($f=$t&($d>>12^$d>>4^
$d^$d/8))<<17,$e=$e>>8^($t&($g=($q=$e>>14&7^$e)^$q*8^$q<<6))<<9,$_=$t[$_]^
(($h>>=8)+=$f+(~$g&$t))for at a[128..$#a]}print+x"C*", at a}';s/x/pack+/g;eval
More information about the bind-users
mailing list