cname quick question
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Wed Mar 7 22:22:09 UTC 2001
At 6:09 PM +0000 3/7/01, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
> It seems that there are political reasons for not doing that, but
> in that case it would not be the same name as another record because
> there would NOT be an NS or SOA record for the name.
>
> I agree that CNAME at the top of a zone does not work.
Right, but surely most folks who would want to take advantage of
this kind of feature would want to be able to get mail to the aliased
domain, which would also break because of the "no other records" rule.
--
======================================================================
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list