Difference from 8.2 to 9.x
Joseph S D Yao
jsdy at cospo.osis.gov
Fri Mar 2 21:02:15 UTC 2001
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 12:06:34PM -0800, Ed - Bind wrote:
...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric LaZur" <elazur at hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
> To: <comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Difference from 8.2 to 9.x
>
>
> > Just got done upgrading bind 8.2 to 9.1.1rc1, and let me tell you, its not
> > pretty.
> >
> > The actual upgrade was simple, but am having problems keeping and
> > maintaining it. Things I found so far after a couple of days.
> > 1) named.conf file has changed. Better bone up on new parameters,
> > especailly if you do Zone transfers.
Did you read doc/misc/migration? Most ofthat is in there.
> > 2) Many more error messages in the logs, like the CLASS256 message.
Welcomed, if you want to know what's going wrong.
> > 3) Cannot edit/update your zone tables by hand. I still haven't figured
> out
> > how to do it.
Nope, that's how I do it.
> > 4) ndc reload has been replaced by rndc reload, but now you need a
> > configuration file for rndc.
Well, we may get used to that. I had actually suggested this at one
point. ;-) [How else to tell it of an unconventional communications
node? Not via command line arguments!]
--
Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list