CNAMEs and DNSSEC?

[Michael Kjorling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks a lot Kevin - you're right.

But it's an interesting thing to note that I got your reply BEFORE my
original post :-)


Michael Kjörling


On Jun 19 2001 18:51 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Don't worry, be happy! The DNSSEC record types (SIG, NXT and KEY) are a
> special case with respect to the "CNAME and other data" rule (see
> RFC 2181 Section 10.1).
>
> - Kevin

- -- 
Michael Kjörling - michael at kjorling.com - PGP: 8A70E33E
"We must be the change we wish to see" (Mahatma Gandhi)

^..^     Support the wolves in Norway -- go to     ^..^
 \/   http://home.no.net/ulvelist/protest_int.htm   \/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7L9teKqN7/Ypw4z4RAufHAJ99T4BQJjmhzeooK+FrdGp4yx08TwCg4ucV
sjTMkMbYKwua+tj2EP9ouqc=
=v4iR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----