BIND9 reverse delegation
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Jan 31 18:43:51 UTC 2001
>>>>> "Jesse" == Jesse DeFer <jesse_defer at choicehotels.com> writes:
Jesse> I have noticed that BIND9 handles reverse lookups
Jesse> differently than BIND8. It doesn't seem to let you
Jesse> 'over-ride' reverse entries that have been delegated, in
Jesse> the parent.
In fact apart from essential glue, BIND9 doesn't let you add any data
that lives under the zone cut for a delegated zone.
... example snipped ...
Jesse> Have I been doing it wrong all along and it's been 'fixed' in BIND9?
Yes and yes. You got away with it because BIND[48] had one monolithic
cache for everything. BIND9 doesn't.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list