DNS & BIND (O'Reilly book)
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Jan 24 08:58:56 UTC 2001
>>>>> "Helmlein" == Helmlein <helmlein at hotmail.com> writes:
>> BIND 8 is more proven and stable than BIND 9. You might want
>> to just set up a BIND 8 server.
Helmlein> I agree; not that I've had many crashes with BIND 9
Have you filed any bug reports about these crashes? BTW some of the
problems people have found in BIND9 are actually faults in the OS's
threading software. [Not that this really matters because the end
result is an unresponsive name server.] To get around these problems
BIND9.1 can be compiled as a single-threaded application.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list