Bind 8.2.2.P7 and W2K
Tim Maestas
tmaestas at dnsconsultants.com
Tue Jan 2 22:42:11 UTC 2001
Stop whatever it is that's sending the update. If dnd1 is the
master and 192.168.1.10 is a slave, then it looks like something
sent a dynamic update to a slave nameserver, and the slave is
attempting to forward it to the master. Win2k boxes by default
attempt to dynamically update their A and PTR records. This
is configurable in the TCP/IP properties.
-Tim
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, News Account wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. The IP listed in the error is a DNS, but it is a
> slave (secondary by W2K standards) and is trying to update the master(dnd1)
> my question was how can I stop this if the W2K box is setup NOT to update.
> Is it a Windows problem? (I think that I already know the answer.)
> Thanks
>
> "Tim Maestas" <tmaestas at dnsconsultants.com> wrote in message
> news:92mv9l$m75 at pub3.rc.vix.com...
> >
> >
> > This message means that 192.168.1.10 sent a dynamic update to
> > dnd1 for domain.com. The allow-update clause for domain.com
> > on dnd1 does not allow updates from that client. RFC compliant
> > clients will attempt to update the nameserver listed in the
> > MNAME field of the SOA record for domain.com. If this server
> > is unreachable, it will try the rest of the servers listed
> > in the NS records for the zone. I didn't understand from
> > you message if you meant the ip listed in the error message
> > was the DNS server on Win2k, or if dnd1 was the DNS server.
> > In any case, you should be able to figure out what's going
> > on from the explanation above.
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, News Account wrote:
> >
> > > I know! "Not again you windows people."
> > > I personally love *nix but I don't make the decisions.
> > >
> > > Now then, I keep getting this:
> > > Dec 30 13:12:25 dnd1 named[1042]: unapproved update from
> [192.168.1.10].1510
> > > for domain.com
> > >
> > > This is a secondary DNS server on W2K. It updates correctly, but why is
> it
> > > trying to update the master? Or do I not understand the error?
> > > TIA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list