no matching view in class 'CLASSxxxx'

David Komanek xdavid at aragorn.natur.cuni.cz
Mon Dec 10 10:19:39 UTC 2001




Thanks,

do you have some idea what can be wrong in the clients ? It seems, MS
Windows is the case ....

Thanks again :-)

David


On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Michael Kjorling wrote:

>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Fix your broken clients. The message simply means that there was no
> view matching the given class number - if BIND cannot translate it to
> a name, it is nonstandard.
>=20
> Generally speaking you should be able to just ignore these.
>=20
>=20
> Michael Kj=F6rling
>=20
>=20
> On Dec 10 2001 10:43 +0100, David Komanek wrote:
>=20
> > Hello,
> >
> > please, how to avoid the %subject% ? What is wrong ? This message
> > appeared after I upgraded to Bind 9.1.2 from my old 8.x version. Comes
> > from various clinets with various class numbers. Something wrong with
> > the nameserver or rather with clinets ? Heterogenous network with many
> > versions of Windows, NetWare, Unixes, .... is some service denied to th=
e
> > client when the message appears ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >    David
>=20
> - --=20
> Michael Kj=F6rling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
> PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e   \/
> Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4
>=20
> "There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
> and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
> (Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html
>=20
> iD8DBQE8FIS0KqN7/Ypw4z4RAmU/AJ47cqjopqd7FeLqw/Di6UgEizwD7gCeOnB7
> gFE1nReTCg1bTGxY1H93oW8=3D
> =3DZjEr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>=20
>=20
>=20



More information about the bind-users mailing list