DNS zone below syntactically and semantically correct??
Michael Kjorling
michael at kjorling.com
Mon Dec 10 08:57:42 UTC 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As has been pointed out already, you do need NS records. Other than
that, ``named-admin.renard.fh-worms.de.'' is not a valid RRtype. The
TTLs seem a bit strange to me but that is not a problem as far as BIND
is concerned.
And of course, did you try named-checkzone?
Michael Kjörling
On Dec 9 2001 21:13 +0100, Manuel Weber wrote:
> Is the DNS zone below syntactically and semantically correct?
> If no, which entry is wrong?
>
> Fh-Worms.DE. IN SOA renard.Fh-Worms.DE.
> named-admin.renard.Fh-Worms.DE.
> ( 2000052901
> 7200
> 900
> 3600000
> 87400
> )
> villon IN A 143.93.160.3
> gopher 41200 IN CNAME villon.Fh-Worms.DE.
> renard 90345 IN A 143.93.160.6
- --
Michael Kjörling -- Programmer/Network administrator ^..^
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e \/
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4
"There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
(Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html
iD8DBQE8FHkJKqN7/Ypw4z4RAm//AJ4nLsOtitxZ6SaENxTEtYTboOBibwCfSdmT
Mnkc/nZktHGpHU7gynfmzY8=
=vP1T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bind-users
mailing list