DENIC and SOA numbers?
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Thu Apr 19 00:26:26 UTC 2001
DENIC have overstepped the mark here. All those counter
values were reasonable.
refresh = 1h
retry = 20m
expire = 60d
There is a big difference between DE and CHRYSLER.COM.
DE is providing public infrastructure. DE and its
subdomains don't have a common corporate relationship.
CHRYSLER.COM and subdomains do.
If DENIC want to implement sanity checks then they should be
sanity checks not arbitary limits which is evidenced from
the ranges reported.
Now a DNS hosting company may have want to look at refresh
and retry values as it impacts their ability to serve all
their customers.
Mark
>
> They have every right to regulate the contents of their own subdomains, just
> as
> I have the right to regulate the contents of chrysler.com subdomains. That's
> what
> "delegation" means. If you don't like their TLD, pick another one.
>
>
> - Kevin
>
> John Oliver wrote:
>
> > I just got this email, and am not too happy about it...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: CSL Hostmaster [mailto:hostmaster at csl-gmbh.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:26 AM
> > > To: Weikel, Duane
> > > Subject: Re: [domreg at nic.de: Re: UPDATE: cyva.de]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:03:34PM -0400, Weikel, Duane wrote:
> > > > We submitted a server change request for the domain name of
> > > > 'cyva.de' on the online (internet) form and we have not had a respone f
> rom
> > > > you. Please change the domain name of 'cyva.de' to be on the following
> > > two
> > > > servers:
> > > >
> > > > Server: ns.connectnet.com
> > > > Address: 207.110.0.60
> > > >
> > > > Server: ns2.connectnet.com
> > > > Address: 207.110.0.128
> > >
> > > DENIC requires a specific range of values for SOA record entries:
> > >
> > > ns.connectnet.com.: SOA value expire (5184000) does not fit in range [604
> 800
> > > ... 3600000].
> > > ns.connectnet.com.: SOA value retry (1200) does not fit in range [1800 ..
> .
> > > 28800].
> > > ns.connectnet.com.: SOA value refresh (3600) does not fit in range [10000
> > > ... 86400].
> > >
> > > And DENIC doesn't allow all NS records for a domain in the same Class C
> > > network
> > > (to avoid a single point of failure).
> > >
> > > So unfortunatlely your update was rejected by DENIC.
> >
> > What business do they have telling me what values to use in my zone
> > files? I'm not aware of any precedent for this, nor any valid technical
> > reason. But, not being a guru, I want to ask before I roast them over a
> > slow fire. Am I correct in believing that this is something that ICANN
> > wouldn't view very favorably?
> >
> > --
> > John Oliver, System Administrator http://www.allegiancetele.com
> > ConnectNet, an Allegiance Telecom company http://www.connectnet.com
> > 6370 Lusk Blvd. Ste F103 (858) 638-2020
> > San Diego, CA. 92121 FAX: (858) 623-1505
>
>
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list