BIND 9.1.1 responses different from 8.2.3
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Tue Apr 17 08:46:42 UTC 2001
The zone is total mess. You can't expect any server to cope
with garbage like this.
Mark
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> any fmprc.gov.cn @202.99.26.9
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; fmprc.gov.cn, type = ANY, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
fmprc.gov.cn. 1H IN NS wjb1.
fmprc.gov.cn. 1H IN SOA wjb1. . (
27 ; serial
1H ; refresh
10M ; retry
1D ; expiry
1H ) ; minimum
fmprc.gov.cn. 1H IN MX 1 202.99.26.9.
;; Total query time: 857 msec
;; FROM: drugs.dv.isc.org to SERVER: 202.99.26.9
;; WHEN: Tue Apr 17 18:45:14 2001
;; MSG SIZE sent: 30 rcvd: 110
> It seems that BIND 9.1.1 gives different replies than that of 8.2.3... I hav
> e
> a setup which runs both (9.1.1 on Solaris7 SPARC and 8.2.3 on Linux x86) and
> when our mail server tries to deliver mail to a site (fmprc.gov.cn), it fails
>
> when the resolver is pointing at the 9.1.1 but goes through when pointed at
> 8.2.3....
>
> this is really odd...
>
> anyone has ideas on what's going on?
>
> thanks
>
>
> rgds,
>
> - ron
>
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list