More backround: Interesting problem.
nicolew at icehouse.net
nicolew at icehouse.net
Thu Apr 5 05:15:52 UTC 2001
Gentleman? And the information I was looking for came from a person named Chip.
MISS NICOLE
Quoting Doug Barton <DougB at dougbarton.net>:
>
> Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:28:48PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > ...
> > > This isn't a DNS problem, it's a registrar problem. Your whois
> record
> > > still shows verio nameservers.
> >
> > WHOIS and DNS are two entirely different protocols
> >
> > and may be inconsistent, especially in the lack of a concerted effort
> > to keep them consistent.
> >
> > WHOIS records are irrelevant to DNS
> > except to SUGGEST possible problems.
>
> Which was exactly the point I was making, and was precisely the
> information the poster needed. My first sentence was the controlling
> point,
> and based on the original post I felt that pointing the gentleman in the
> right direction without spelling out every nauseating detail of the
> situation would be sufficient, and guess what, I was right.
>
> Next time you feel like making a smart-ass comment, 1) Make sure you're
> right, 2) Realize that it still makes you an ass, and 3) Lie down till
> the
> feeling goes away.
>
>
> --
> Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has
> done
> to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
> simply because they are their opinions.
>
> Do YOU Yahoo!?
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list