Problems resolution names.
Rafael Cruz M.
rcruz at cetro-crece.org.mx
Wed Sep 13 22:15:18 UTC 2000
I have configures with "forward only" but in this case I got the internet
server with an IP valid in Internet, wich belong to a subnet assigned by my
ISP, but at the same time the subnet belong to a NAT IP pull configures
directly in the router.
Is ther any problem with this case for DNS ???
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> You know, I just noticed [obviously I wasn't looking hard enough
> earlier]:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:42:57AM +1100, Mark.Andrews at nominum.com wrote:
> ...
> > > I just have configured this ...
> > >
> > > #####################################################################
> > > options {
> > > directory "/var/named";
> > > pid-file "/var/named/named.pid";
> > > named-xfer "/usr/sbin/named-xfer";
> > >
> > > transfers-in 10;
> > > forward only;
> > > fake-iquery yes;
> > > pollfd-chunk-size 20;
> > >
> > > //#ident "@(#)cmd-inet:var/named/named.boot 1.2"
> > > //
> > > //boot file for name server
> > > //
> > > //type domain source file or host
> > > //
> > >
> > > };
>
> It says "forward only;". But no "forwarders {...};" statement.
>
> If you are behind a firewall, please enter a "forwarders { X; };"
> statement, where "X" is the IP address of your firewall [from the
> inside].
>
> If you are NOT in fact behind a firewall, take out the "forward only;"
> line.
>
> --
> Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
> COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> PLEASE ... send or Cc: all "COSPO/OSIS Computer Support"
> mail to sys-adm at cospo.osis.gov
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list