Re-writing RFC1918 addresses? [Was: Re: Looking for way to mark a zone no-xfer for a sub-domain .]
Bill Manning
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Tue Sep 12 14:12:20 UTC 2000
%
% On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:54:01AM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
% > The kicker is that RFC 1918 addresses in email headers
% > are -NOT- filtered by NATs/Firewalls and so escape into
% > the Internet. They ought to be re-written at the ALG.
%
% ISTM that that is a debatable opinion. I'm not clear on why you
% believe this - I can imagine, but I would rather have you specify which
% header lines you are talking about, what problems this would cause, and
% what justification there is for overwriting valid tracking information
% or addressing lines.
%
% --
% Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
I really don't like getting this type of mail.
Check the second received line.
.....
This spam seemingly came through or orignated on your network. I object in the
strongest of terms to receiving this type of email and have reported this incident
to the Federal Trade Commission. Please see that I do not receive anymore.
Regards,
Jeff
Received: from atipa.com ([64.64.30.2])
by procyon.blazenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA18910
for <jhorn at blazenet.net>; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 06:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thgzg.msn.com (firewall.atipa [192.168.1.1]))
by atipa.com with SMTP id e8C5FD327645;
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:15:13 -0500
.......
--
--bill
More information about the bind-users
mailing list