Netware DHCP -> IRIX DDNS
dreamwvr
dreamwvr at dreamwvr.com
Sat Jun 17 18:58:58 UTC 2000
Hi,
i could be way off here as it has been a long time since i have done novell..
> I'm a newbie, so please be patient with me...
we are all there in some varying degree as everything changes always.. yet
remains the same;-))
> We are about to introduce dynamic DNS into our network which consists of
> many LANs connected through a WAN. We have a choice between a Unix nd
> Novell netware solution. Both platforms implements the service with a
> version of bind 8. All our existing DHCP servers are based on Netware.
DDNS is part of the latest Bind but i have not implemented so can't comment
accurately. Save on the licences and a dos based system ;-)) either use
some flavour of Linux or BSD. DNS = "DNS"
Your into unix so use BSD as well for a DNS server and/or a DHCPD server it
really is not that hardware demanding and get more bang for your buck.
> Our Netware admins claim that there is no way for these servers to update
walk on water right.. cept their using dos;-))
> a Unix DNS master. Do anybody know if this claim is correct? Have they
> overlooked something?
DHCP is a standard last time i checked and updates are merely strings passing
across the wire so as long as Novell follows standards i really can't see the
problem. How would i handle this? Hmmm.. you know you need to get out more when
your answering your own questions;-)) Anyways i would for redundancy get two
boxes in your co lab and well setup DNS whatever OS on them and DHCP and
then prove them wrong:-)) Then once i knew how to do dynamic DNS i which
naturally uses DHCP i would well put a sniffer on the wire to confirm that the
Novell "did" operate the same way standards wise so that i did not say
something that i could not substantiate. Then i would have them show how it
works on Novell just so i could get the signals. Then once i had confirmed that
there was no benefit "Really" besides keeping the peace between NIX and Novell
i would call them on it with a proof of concept that worked in NIXland. The
key is proof of concept. I seldom have found that bean counter driven corp do
not understand the word TCO or mean time to failure..
> A clear advantage for a netware solution is the
support for replication of > the DNS database. However if we choose a Unix
Secondaries is what provides redundanct as that is basically why you are
told to have 2 DNS servers @ least:-)) If you speaking of NDIS or whatever they
call it well hmm.. just use rsync combined with ssh and you have them beat
anyhow . Plus well Open Source IMHO is more secure than Novell as
well as more extendable. Suppose i hae made lots of Novell "Supervisors" pissed
but oh well. Like i said it has been a long time;-D
solution, and our WAN go > down, will the DHCP servers be able to
update the Unix DNS master with > changes since the break occured or will DHCP
service grind to a halt due > to lack of names from the master server?
Good question well just use masters that are each delegated to a specific sub
zone then at worse one workgroup per se goes out. Hey if your master is down
then you need to use the secondaries or whatever. Again since i have not config
such a arrangement i could be wrong on some accounts as i do not claim to be
perfect:-)) Secondly if the MAster is required for DHCP update which i doubt
since that is why you have redundancy builtin to DNS.. Novell will not be any
better thats for sure
Best Regards,
dreamwvr at dreamwvr.com.
> Any pointers what so
ever will be highly appreciated. >
> Regards,
>
> Viktor Fosland
> Sysadmin UNIX
> Kværner Oil & Gas
--
Reuters, London, February 29, 1998:
Scientists have announced discovering a meteorite which will strike the
earth in March, 2028. Millions of UNIX coders expressed relief for being
spared the UNIX epoch "crisis" of 2038.
_______________________________________________________________________
************** DREAMWVR.COM - TOTAL INTERNET SERVICES ****************
TOTAL DESIGN - DEVELOPMENT - INTEGRATION - SECURITY - Click Here..
<http://www.dreamwvr.com/services/MAX_SEC.html>;
DREAMWVR.COM - The Console of Many... 90 Topics Covered
<http://www.dreamwvr.com/dynamicduo.html>;
<mailto:dreamwvr at dreamwvr.com>;
->> LINUX-MANDRAKE Solution Provider and North American Distributor<<-
PRODUCT OF THE YEAR!
<http://www.dreamwvr.com/mandrake/mandrake-main.html>;
"===0 PGP Key Available
*************** "As Unique as the Company You Keep."*****************
"If anyone speaks from DREAMWVR.COM its certainly not me:-)"
________________________________________________________________________
More information about the bind-users
mailing list