Running Primary DNS server with Dynamic Assigned IP in Win2K possible?
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Feb 29 23:42:38 UTC 2000
>>>>> "David" == David Cost <dcost at post.com> writes:
David> I've been struggling with this for some time now, and so
David> far have not been able to get a definitative
David> answer. Wondering if anyone else has actually achieved
David> using Win2K Server for Primary DNS server on ADSL if their
David> IP is reassigned every month or two by their ISP's DHCP
David> server? No matter what I do it looks like I cannot achieve
David> it. I tried some suggestions submitted a month or two ago
David> in this group, but none have worked so far. I'm curious to
David> know if anyone in fact has actually achieved this si at
David> least I can determine if it is more than theoretically
David> possible.
There is no intrinsic DNS reason why a dynamically assigned address
cannot be used for a master name server: it's just another IP address
after all. However, using dynamically assigned addresses is painful
because there are administrative problems. For example, getting any
slave servers to change their configuration so they check today's
current address of the master server. That new address may also have
to be reflected in zone files. This is all too much like hard
work. Fixed addresses are generally needed for master (primary) name
servers.
There might be other W2K reasons for insisting that the master server
has to have a fixed IP address, like Active Directory synchronisation
or Registry settings. I don't know or care about these things.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list