Speed of BIND vs. W2k DNS
Barry Finkel
b19141 at achilles.ctd.anl.gov
Tue Dec 26 02:05:22 UTC 2000
"alevey" <alevey at home.com> wrote:
> You missed a HUGE aspect of W2K DNS... multi-master. No single point of
> failure, unlike BIND.
As has been posted previously, with a MS Active Directory-integrated DNS,
there are times when the zones on each of the Domain Controllers has different
serial numbers. I have also noticed this in our W2k testbed (until we decided
that we did not need AD-integrated zones). We had one case where a zone on a
single AD-integrated zone (i.e., only one DC) became corrupted (lower serial
number) after the DC had a non-clean shutdown and reboot (e.g., after a power
failure). I do not consider this a case of "No single point of failure".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry S. Finkel
Electronics and Computing Technologies Division
Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277
9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-9689
Building 221, Room B236 Internet: BSFinkel at anl.gov
Argonne, IL 60439-4844 IBMMAIL: I1004994
More information about the bind-users
mailing list