Do I need PTR RRs?
ccantu at us.ibm.com
ccantu at us.ibm.com
Wed Aug 2 22:35:28 UTC 2000
The printer has its own NIC, and there's no seperate print server because
the printer also has a hard drive for spooling jobs. From your
description, and our printing methods, it would seem I could get away
without the PTR RR. I might still have the DHCP server issue the PTR as
well as the A updates, but I'm a bit clearer as to what is "required" and
what is "nice to have".
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos Cantu/Boulder/IBM on 08/02/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------
"Vu Pham ( Sivell )" <vu at sivell.com>@isc.org on 08/02/2000 03:45:57 PM
Sent by: bind-users-bounce at isc.org
To: Carlos Cantu/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
Subject: Re: Do I need PTR RRs?
----- Original Message -----
From: <ccantu at us.ibm.com>
To: <bind-users at isc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 3:29 PM
Subject: Do I need PTR RRs?
>
> If I have a printer and everyone sets up their print queues using its IP
> address -- then if I have an A resource record for that printer, they'd
be
> able to use the printer's FQDN to set up the queues, right? But I would
> have no use for a PTR RR unless I ever wanted to do an nslookup of that
> printer's IP address, right? The questions: Is there any significant
> disadvantage to not doing the PTR RRs in this case? In what case would
the
> PTR RR be a necessity?
>
> Carlos
>
In my opinion, we will need the PTR RR for reverse lookup ( gethostbyaddr
).
If any app requires to have reverse lookup for an IP, then you must have
the PTR RR for the host/device. For example, sendmail will refuse the relay
if it can not look for the name of an ip address.
If your print server just accepts connection from print client & does not
need to connect to any host , then the PTR RR may be unecessary.
Pls correct me.
Vu
More information about the bind-users
mailing list