DNS implementations
Johnny Fribert Lauridsen
jlaurids at cisco.com
Sun Apr 2 11:51:58 UTC 2000
Gary,
is this 'DNS resolve' load balancing in MVS/sysplex,
or does it also include some scheme for multiple primaries - e.g. load balancing
and redundancy? Do you have a url and maybe one of the good redbooks/url's on this implementation?
Thanks.
Johnny
At 09:49 01/04/2000 -0500, gmcafee at us.ibm.com wrote:
>Johnny asks:
>"Are there others? For example - are the mainframe implementations in IBM
>MVS and IBM VM also ground-up
>implementations?"
>
>
>Response:
>IBM has a ground up implementation that is used on MVS and VM which uses
>DB2. It still exists in the field today, however, we are no longer
>shipping that version of the name server. We have shipped a version 4.9.3
>BIND-based name server only for MVS for several years now which has
>enhancements. One enhancement is to take advantage of true, dynamic load
>balancing in an IBM sysplex by distributing work to hosts with the most
>capacity. The other major enhancement was an RFC2065-based version of DDNS
>(before BIND8 was on the scene). I don't know about VM and what kind of
>name server that operating system uses now.
>
>Gary McAfee
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list