valid names on RRs
Michael Voight
mvoight at cisco.com
Tue Jul 13 19:41:57 UTC 1999
yes it is legal..
Michael Voight
Cisco TAC
spitz at us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Is the following a legal name?
>
> fred.barney IN A 1.1.1.1
>
> Using a 4.9.3 server, the name fred.barney.xxx (xxx being my domain) is resolved
> correctly, but I'm not sure if I'm violating any naming rules. I would prefer
> not to set up a barney.xxx domain.
>
> In a quick look through the RFCs and the DNS and BIND book, I don't see anything
> that tells me this in invalid.
>
> Thanks, Julie
>
> SecureWay Communications Server for OS/390
> (919)254-4421 (T/L 444), SPITZ @ IBMUSM25
> Internet: spitz at us.ibm.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list