DD file copy from PRI to SEC is unmatched
Masataka_Tanaka
mtanaka at ssd.sony.co.jp
Mon Dec 6 01:24:57 UTC 1999
Hello, there.
Barry, thank for your help.
Tanaka > The system has DNS primary and secondary, and a head part
> of one of the DDF(Domain Data File) is as follows :
Margolin> They're usually called "zone files" or "DB files". I've never
> heard "DDF" before -- where did you get that from?
Actually I had worked at Hewlett-Packard,Japan for one and half of year :
at that time, I was taught the technical term "zone file" as "Domain Data
File".
The contents of 'DNS&BIND mngt' training manual also tells so.... (T-T)
(teardrops)
Tanaka > (2) On the other hand, copied DDF(Domain Data File)
> zzz.yyy.xxx.zone from primary DNS_A to secondary
> DNS_B has next format.
Margolin> DNS transfers zones, not files.
> All the data that was in the INCLUDEd files
> should be in the zone file on the secondary server.
It was perfectly my oversight.
There existed NO data loss. Sorry :-)
Tanaka > Especially WITH WHAT WAY the primary data file transfered
> to secondary's ??
> FOR WHAT does the defference between PRI and SEC zonefile
> mean??
Margolin> The primary sends all the records that are in the zone,
> as a big DNS response to a zone transfer query by the
secondary.
> It's not sent as text, but in the internal binary format that
DNS
> uses (see RFC 1035).
Looks there should be some shortage of my studying 'bout DNS.
Thank you so much for your advice.
I shall check RFC1035 right now.
>--
>Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
>GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
>*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
>Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the
group.
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
Sony Systems Design Corp.
Masataka Tanaka (Tokyo, JPN)
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
More information about the bind-users
mailing list