BIND - how predominant?

Bill Manning bmanning at ISI.EDU
Thu Aug 19 23:47:10 UTC 1999


> 
> > Tough call.  My own studies indicate that from a position of 99.2% (the
> > 0.8% was indeterminate) penetration (sample size of 380021 zones - 3q97) 
> > In the last run, (sample size of 649331 zones - 2q99) Bind has dropped 
> > to 94.6%, with the other contenders (looks like four-six varients, two 
> > of which are likely independent source trees) each less than 2.0% each. 
> 
> Is this BIND on everything, or BIND on quasi-Unices?  The proportion of
> the latter would drop, once there were BIND ports for non-Unix systems.
> 
> --
> Joe Yao				jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao

	This is BIND vs other DNS servers. I did not jump through the
	hoops to try and discover the underlying OS.
	Of course there are places I can't see... (care to let me
	in next pass... :)

	The 100,000m level is at:
	http://www.isi.edu/div7/people/bmanning.home/in-addr-audit.html


--bill


More information about the bind-users mailing list