BIND - how predominant?

[Michael Voight]

Does W2K not use BIND??
I only know one non BIND DNS server product and that is because I
provide tech support for it. It is also the only product I know of that
has IXFR working and also follows the DHCP failover draft rfc. (yes, it
is a DNS/DHCP server from a company we (Cisco) bought last summer)

Michaelh

Willard Dawson wrote:
> 
> "Erik J. Sawyer" <esawyer at ntp.com> writes:
> 
> >WITHOUT going into a flame war about how BIND is (or isn't) superior to
> >every other flavor of DNS around....
> 
> >Can someone point me to an AUTHORITATIVE resource which states the
> >percentage of DNS servers on the net (or in the public & private world)
> >which run a flavor of BIND on a flavor of Unix?  I need this info as
> >research for a presentation.
> 
> >Much obliged,
> >Erik J. Sawyer
> >Senior Consultant
> >NTP Consulting
> 
> Of course, you'll be sure to present an un-W2K-biased report when you're
> done, right? ;-)
> --
> Willard Francis Otto Dawson      +1 770 814 5099 / +1 770 814 5202 FAX
> Siemens Business Services, SCN   mailto:willard.dawson at sbs.siemens.com
> 4570 River Green Pkwy, Ste 140   http://www.sbs.siemens.com/
> Duluth, GA  30096-2564           Standard disclaimer applies.